Never on time, usually wrong, but we might make you laugh.
Google
Welcome to The Late Flag! And thank you for reading our regular (well, nearly) postings on this site. We're here to talk about football, since that's what we do all day anyway. If you enjoy this site, or hell, even if you don't, please recommend it to your friends and football-loving acquaintances. The "comments" link at the end of every posting lets you add your views, so please - argue with us, agree with us, add to our points, and we'll discuss your opinion in future posts. Right, that's the intro covered, so here's the footy for today...

Thursday, August 16, 2007

Poor Start Due to Poor Summer?


Only 2 games into the new season (not even that for some) and it’s already becoming apparent which clubs have – and have not – spent well this summer. Of course, it’s far too early to talk about individual players, plenty will take time to settle in. I’m talking instead about the areas of the squad that clubs have invested in, and whilst again it’s probably too early to make definitive judgements, three or four trends are fast becoming clear.

With two points and no points respectively from fairly generous-looking starts, Manchester United and Tottenham have done nothing to answer critics of their summer transfer policies. One goal in two games is a huge contrast from the way the Champions opened their campaign last season, and questions are already being asked about the way United did business in the summer.

Quite clearly, they were always going to be seen as the team to beat this year. With the exception of the big four, every opponent the Red Devils face this season will be tough to break down, getting men behind the ball in an attempt to shackle Ferguson’s men. In this sense - on the surface of things – the signings of creative geniuses and hot young prospects Tevez, Nani and Anderson look like just what United will need to prevent a season of frustration. But this is overlooking one major factor – Manchester United have only one striker in their whole squad, and he goes by the name of Louis “Darren Anderton” Saha.

In playing Wayne Rooney on his own up front for large parts of last season, United quite regularly seemed short of penetration in the final third. Only the pace, trickery, form and genius of Cristiano Ronaldo saved their bacon in several tight encounters last season. Games against Fulham and Reading immediately leap to mind, but bearing in mind Ronaldo bagged over 20 goals, I’d be prepared to bet there are others if I could be arsed to check. The point is, Rooney isn’t a striker, he’s far more comfortable in a withdrawn Dennis Bergkamp-type role – and he’s certainly not a LONE striker.

With his injury, public attention has fast turned to the fact that Carlos Tevez – undoubted class act – is even LESS of a lone striker than Rooney ever will be, lacking the power of the scouse boxing aficionado. For an example of this, imagine Tevez, back to goal, trying to hold the ball up whilst enjoying the attentions of Ryan Nelsen and Chris Samba. Ouch.

If you’ve got a pair of physical centre halves, who’ll not let Tevez get the ball into feet and turn to face goal, you really only have Ronaldo to fear. Shackle him with a man-marking game and a few hefty challenges early on, and hey presto you’ve got a blueprint for negating United. Until Saha is fit and firing, questions over why Ferguson didn’t go and buy a target man this summer will persist. Because I’ll keep asking them.

As for Tottenham, well that’s even worse. Words have been banded about in the papers this week like “gutless”, “shambles”, “disgrace”, and “abysmal”, but I wouldn’t necessarily use any of them to describe Tottenham’s start. I’d say something along the lines of absolutely mind numbingly f**king stupid.

Because that’s what you’d have to be not to realise where Tottenham needed strengthening this summer, and it most certainly wasn’t up front. Granted, they probably needed a centre back, and Younes Kaboul looks a good bet. But Christ almighty, who spends £17m on Darren Bent when they don’t have a midfield?

Where is Spurs’ creativity? Where? I look at their squad and I absolutely despair, when I see the wealth of striking talent at their disposal paired with the gaping hole that is their midfield. Teemo Tainio, Danny Murphy, Didier Zokora, Aaron “what’s an end product?” Lennon, Steed “out of position” Malbranque, Kevin “no-one’s heard of me” Boateng…the list of s**t goes on.

The undisputed king of Spurs midfield mediocrity though, manages to get a place in virtually every England squad. He can’t cross, can’t pass forwards, can’t tackle, isn’t strong, has poor touch, and is nothing special in the air. But he cost £8m, and Steve McClaren loves him. Step forward Jermaine Jenas.

Labelled a “box to box midfielder”, this is purely down to the fact that no-one can work out what he does, rather than being a testament to his industry and versatility. He’s nobody’s idea of a defensive midfielder, and heaven help you if you think he’s a creative player, but he’s a mainstay of midfield in a team that thinks it’s going to be top four this season!? Lampard and Essien, Scholes and Hargreaves, Gerrard and Alonso, Fabregas and Gilberto…Jenas and Zokora. That’s the only time you’ll see the Spurs engine room mentioned in the same breath as those others - without the accompanying words “vastly inferior” - all season. And rightly so.
y
Like United, Spurs have bought quality players this season. Really class acts, from what I can tell. But when those great players don't actually HELP the team (and the lack of others in a certain position actually hinder it), then aren't these great managers just playing a glorified game of fantasy football? It raises the question of whether all the money in the game is clouding the judgement of those in charge of our clubs. "Ooh, I've got £30m, I'll get TEVEZ! F**k off Quieroz, who cares if he's not what we need? He's CARLOS TEVEZ!" Real Madrid will tell you how that works out. And to a lesser extent, so will Freddy Shepherd. (Patrick Kluivert, anyone?)
y
The lesson for us all here is not to get carried away by pre-season hype. Granted, we shouldn’t get carried away now either – we all know Man Utd will challenge, and Spurs will be ok too, if Jenas gets crocked. But the arrivals of the kids from Portugal, the Tevez affair, and the fact that Darren Bent cost more than Thierry Henry had pundits salivating at the idea of both these sides letting loose their goal glut on the nation. There wasn’t one journalist however, who actually sat back, looked at things, and said “but who’s going to hold the ball up for Man U, don’t they need someone to lead the line?” or “Spurs have four great strikers – but with that midfield, will they ever get the ball?”
y
Don’t be distracted by the names in the headlines folks – it’s the qualities of the players that count, and how well they compliment or add to their new squads, not just their reputations. The likes of Healy, Chopra and Sibierski have made flying starts, despite the media telling us how s**t they are. Well I don't know about you, but I'd rather be a Fulham fan than a Spurs one today, and I know which team's boss is safer. Buying what you need is better than buying the latest "big thing".

Tuesday, August 14, 2007

Goals Galore?


A cursory glance at the major signings in the Premiership so far shows exactly where the managers believe this season’s games will be won and lost – up front. Strikers have been bought and sold like nobody’s business - and I’m not just talking about the top 4 either. For all they’ve brought in Tevez, Torres, Pizarro and Eduardo, the rest of the league has followed suit, albeit in more humble financial deals. The list of strikers to have moved clubs this summer is quite staggering, ranging from the incomprehensible (Aliadiere to Middlesbrough, anyone??) to the predictable - if pricey (Bent to Spurs, Nugent to Portsmouth).

Even Newcastle – desperate for a defence – have added Mark Viduka and Alan Smith to a forward line already boasting Michael Owen, Obafemi Martins and fit-again Shola Ameobi. Sunderland spent big on Chopra, Portsmouth brought in Utaka and Nugent, and are still being linked with a move for either Yakubu or Kanoute. Fulham may have built a new squad virtually, but for all the money they spent on their defence, they spent almost as much again on Diomansy Kamara. Not to mention bringing in David Healy alongside him, not that bringing in a player from Leeds costs much these days. But money spent isn’t my point – the values involved don’t interest me, it’s the trend towards strikers.

Manchester City have a new strikeforce, as do West Ham, Middlesbrough, and even Aston Villa when you consider Marlon Harewood has been added to January recruits Young and Carew - that’s 3 players who weren’t there this time last season. I’ve sat and watched these developments with interest all summer, and I think we’re set for exciting changes this season.

In recent years, the likes of Steven Gerrard, Cristiano Ronaldo, and the latest bloke to deflect a Frank Lampard effort have dominated the goal scoring charts. This is especially true since the departure of Van Nistelrooy, who when he left Man U, was clearly the best striker in the country. That left Henry, who got crocked, and so Drogba was the only actual striker to outscore the big 3’s main midfield men. When the likes of Villa, Man City, Newcastle and Bolton haven’t got a striker between them who can outscore a Chelsea midfielder, what chance do they really have of pushing them hard for their Champions League place? Or of actually giving them a decent game twice a season instead of just being swept aside week-in, week-out? Virtually none.

Undoubtedly, it was Blackburn who made the signing of the season last summer, with the capture of Benni McCarthy. The other candidates must surely be Dimitar Berbatov and Carlos Tevez, which perfectly demonstrates the point I want to make. One or two individual managers saw as early as last season that the Premier League was a league without strikers. With Van Nistelrooy gone, all it took was for Henry to get injured and Shevchenko to be crap, and Drogba had the goalscoring charts to himself. Little wonder then, that Blackburn were many people’s surprise team of the season, that Berbatov found himself linked to Man U (as Van Nistelrooy’s potential replacement) and that Tevez finished up there, after saving West Ham single handedly.

Those managers who bought strikers last season were by and large rewarded, with other, less spectacular (but still notable) contributions from the likes of Johnson and Martins. The majority of strikers bought last summer – excluding the “best of them all” Shevchenko – made major contributions to their clubs. But mostly, these clubs were the same old suspects. Spurs, Everton, Newcastle…the bigger clubs in the league who tend to have goalscorers envied by others. Blackburn were unique in that they tried to break into that group by bringing in a man who could win games on his own. They tested the theory that good, organised teamwork will only get you so far without a class act to put the ball in the net. McCarthy worked his magic and saved Blackburn’s season, whilst the likes of Man City, Fulham, Sheffield United, Watford, Middlesbrough, Portsmouth etc could only watch on and wish they’d thought of following suit.

Well this season they bloody well have done. The promoted teams have all splashed out on potential goalscorers, as have teams like Middlesbrough and Fulham that many tip for the drop. Taking the McCarthy-Blackburn example (and I know not all of them will reach that goal tally, but still…) if even half of these new strikers perform to his standards then how many of their clubs will be surprising us on a weekly basis? With the exception of Derby, I don’t see a side in the Premiership without a potential match winner in their squad, many of them brought in this summer.

Surely then, the age of a striker-less Premier League is dead. The age of Lampard, Gerrard and Ronaldo battling with a solitary striker at the top of the goalscoring charts is dead. The age of Portsmouth – Man City being a crappy 0-0 draw that you wouldn’t watch if it was being played in your garden is well and truly dead.

Long live the age of strikers, and the age of goals – we could be in for a cracker of a season.


************************************************************************************


And You Thought West Ham Was Dodgy...


Liverpool's opponents in the Champions League qualifier, FC Toulouse, are appearing in this season's competition following a controversy that makes the Tevez-Mascherano affair look clear cut and tame. I wouldn't have thought such a thing possible, until I read the whole sordid tale.


It's the penultimate game of the season, and Toulouse, in 5th, are away to Nantes, who need a win to stay up. It's 0-0 in the 87th minute, and frankly, Nantes are s**t. As you can imagine, the home fans aren't happy bunnies, this was a side in Europe themselves not so long ago. Cue an angry French pitch invasion by the soon to be relegated Nantes fans, forcing the game to be abandoned with 3 or 4 minutes to go. Presumably this was some sort of organised protest, so comprehensive was the invasion, although it could just have easily been a mass attempt to attack their "heroes".


To be fair to Toulouse, they were totally blameless in the situation, their fans weren't involved, and the players left the pitch. However, this is where the sanity ends.


The French FA, in debating what should happen to the remainder of the match, decide not to replay those last few minutes. That's fair enough, there doesn't seem much point in getting everyone together again in Nantes for a 3 minute kickabout. Bizzarely though, they award 3 points to Toulouse. I repeat - the game was 0-0 at the time. Nantes are down, and Toulouse are awarded a 1-0 win. An own goal by the Nantes "12th man" no doubt.


Following the final game of the season, Toulouse finished in a Champions League spot, with 58 points. Rennes, Lens, Bordeaux, and Sochaux all finished on 57. Those extra 2 points, given for a goal they didn't score, got Toulouse not only a European spot, but a Champions League one. Had the invasion not happened, they wouldn't even be in the UEFA Cup.


Can you imagine for just a minute how you'd feel if you were a Rennes, or a Bordeaux fan? Sheffield United would have sued everybody in the Nantes end, presumably. The lesson to learn from this is twofold: Liverpool should qualify with ease (and have no excuse not to), and for all the Premier League appeared like total jackasses over the whole West Ham/MSI affair, it could be a hell of a lot worse.


At least we're not French.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Premier League Week One - Winners and Losers

Winners:


Sund(I)erland

A great result for the newly-promoted Wearsiders. No-one gave them a chance of beating "top four material" Spurs, but despite squandering more than one good chance, the Black Cats came out on top thanks to Michael Chopra's late winner. Paul McShane also put in a noteworthy performance, keeping Dimitar "Pele" Berbatov firmly in his back pocket. A hugely encouraging start.

Manchester City

Another hugely encouraging start. Elano looks a class act, and Bianchi will clearly get goals. He might have made us want to tear our eyes out whilst in charge of England, but Svennis seems to have City playing some good football. A good result against a much-fancied West Ham side.
y
Liverpool

I could easily change this section to read "Jamie Carragher", who must have been the most relieved man in Villa Park after Stevie G baled the Reds out of the hole Carra's rash handball had landed them in. But an aggressive, determined performance meant Liverpool were good value for their win, so I'll include the whole side here.

Blackburn

You're one-nil down, and now Benni McCarthy's f**ked. Let's be honest, if any of us were Sparky, we'd have been chuffed with a draw. But their strength in depth up front shone through, as Derbyshire, and little-fancied debutant Santa Cruz handed them an away win. Santa Cruz might be this year's McCarthy, Premier League sides may learn to write him off at their peril.
y
Newcastle

Another section in which I could be writing about one man - Sam Allardyce must have felt like Christmas had come early when Newcastle went 3-0 up inside half an hour. I was convinced teletext was broken. Turns out it was true, and the Geordies find themselves top of the table. I wouldn't bet on them to win it though.

Birmingham

If they'd gone down 3-0 they'd have been pleased not to have disgraced themselves. So to twice bloody Chelsea's nose and nearly give Mourinho a heart attack, they'll be encouraged by their performance. A game they never in their wildest dreams expected to get anything from, even their defeat will have raised expectations, coming in the manner that it did. A good showing against many people's title favourites.

Arsenal

Hleb scored a goal, and Arsenal didn't drop points after managing to miss hundreds of chances. I make that a 100% improvement on last season.

Chelsea

An entirely expected victory, and one that they nearly f**ked up. But they set a new record for home games without defeat, so I'll tip my cap to them here.


Losers

Tottenham
Oh dear. One defeat does not a season make, so we shouldn't write them off yet, but they must be pretty embarrassed after crowing about top four all summer. Quite frankly, they were s**te.

Tal Ben-Haim

He didn't have a particularly bad game, in my opinion. But he's the man charged with making sure Chelsea don't suffer last season's problems in the absence of John Terry. And on day one, he failed spectacularly to do this. Conceding two at home to Birmingham would be forgiveable in Terry's absence...were it not for the fact that since January Mourinho has been telling us signing Ben Haim would plug the gap.

Bolton

A horrible start for Sammy Lee. Phil Gartside is another who must be embarrassed today, after spending the whole summer telling us how crap Sam Allardyce is, and how Lee is the real architect of their success. Not on that showing Phil.

Manchester United

...and "limpy" Shrek Rooney. Failure to overcome a 10 man Reading team at home will serve as a forewarning of what awaits them this season - teams are scared of them, and this means breaking them down will not be an easy task. Tevez will help, but they'll miss the Scouse Scally and will hope not to repeat this weekend's misdemeanour for a while, as Liverpool have demonstrated the penalties for starting slowly.

Fulham

So near and yet so far. They had their chances to wrap this one up too, and so unlike Birmingham, will probably go away gutted rather than encouraged. Showed enough to suggest they'll be ok this season though, unlike...

Middlesbrough

Losing at home after being one-nil up to a McCarthy-less Blackburn is not a good start. Selling Yakubu over the next two weeks will make it a disastrous one. They need to hang on to him tight, or it'll be a long hard season at the Riverside.

Portsmouth

Time will tell how respectable a point at Derby really is, but at the moment it looks like two points dropped for Harry's boys.

West Ham

Everyone's favourite collection of the biggest tossers in the game looked poor on Saturday, Curbishley's expensively assembled side need to recover and deliver quickly. Looked devoid of ideas now they're Tevez-less. The true extent to which they'd grown to rely on him was painfully evident, although perhaps it'll just take the new boys some time to settle.

My Fantasy League Team

Ashton and Bojinov starting on the bench, McCarthy getting injured just before the 2 appearance points cutoff time, and Ronaldo doing f**k all. Thanks lads.